RSS
 

Archive for the ‘Authentic Speaking’ Category

The Conversation: What to do when your management team does not have the capacity to meet new business demands?

22 May

In my previous blog, I noted the frequency in our practice that we deal with this question or issue. As promised, I will guide you through how you can structure an authentic conversation that can make a difference when dealing with this issue.

This is not a conversation you have with the whole team, rather with each individual team member. When preparing for such a conversation you go through the following items:

  1. Start by asking permission, by stating your concern and your commitment. The latter should always be on how you can make you and the other successful; otherwise the conversation will go nowhere. For example, one concern could be that if the executive does not take different actions, the company will cease to exist. Your commitment should be that you are willing to work together to identify those actions that will make the executive, the team and company successful. When you deliver the message this way, it is highly likely that the executive you are speaking with is willing to listen what you have to say.
  2. Then you clearly state the facts that back up your claims and interpretations. It is only a fact if you can instrument, video or audio record the action. If you cannot do any of these three, it is an interpretation. You need facts to ground your interpretations, such as your question. For example, if inventory management is important in your industry, you can measure if your inventory is larger or smaller than the industry average. As you can see, just this one fact can have different, and even opposing interpretations of why this might be good or bad.
  3. Show the executive how these facts bring you to the interpretation: “the management team currently does not have the capacity to meet new business demands.” If you cannot point to any facts to ground this interpretation, then you have to take a moment to see if you are just making up a story (we all do quite a bit of that). Most likely, once you have identified all your facts, there is a good chance that there will be other, and equally powerful, interpretations that would lead to different actions.
  4. As you go through this conversation, it is important that you highlight the mood and emotion that this creates. It is likely that one emotion in this case is fear, the fear of going out of business. The mood it creates might show up, as “we are doomed.” What this means is that although you are still there as an employee, your mind is somewhere else most likely looking for your next opportunity.

 

You should go through this, and then the other person should go through the same four steps. You should do this back and forth as most likely there will be some facts and interpretations that the other has about you, that you didn’t know. In my experience, this very conversation will open up some new interpretations that you both did not think possible ahead of this conversation. It is likely that you would both be surprised by each other’s interpretations, but it will also highlight what was missing.

These are the beginning steps of creating a very powerful and revealing conversation that will lead to creating different results. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or share any similar stories.

Share
 

What to do when your management team does not have the capacity to meet new business demands?

08 May

This is a question I deal with on a regular basis in our consulting practice. Either it is about the executive team, the marketing team, engineering team or any other team. You see this question often in organization with stronger silos. There is a lot of danger in those broad statements that need to be further clarified for the sake of the organization.

When you are in an organization where this happens, we make these broad statements about other teams often times without fully grounding these statements. Most likely, something happened in the past, and you made a story up about it, and then what happened and the story collapsed and you start living out of that story as it is the truth with a capital T. Once that happens, you most likely start defending that story, and even worse, amongst your team members you all agree on the story, and now this is the foundation for any future action in relation to that team. Do you recognize this happening?

What else has not happened? Chances are is that you, or anyone on your team, have never shared that story with anyone of the team that you are characterizing as not capable. Nobody on that team was able to explore it with you, even more, there is a good chance they are not even aware that this is what you think of them.

It still serves us though! When something goes wrong you can blame the other team for the problems, and because you never checked it out, you get to be right about it too! Let’s explore this for the management team.

This story is only an interpretation! When you are in this situation, what do you think the answers will be to the following questions?

  • Would the people on the management team agree with this interpretation?
  • Is this something that the management team has realized?
  • Does it really apply to every person in the management team?

 

In general, it is highly unlikely that every single executive on such a team does not have the capacity to meet the new business demands. What I could believe, if there are facts, that they are not appreciating the new business reality, and that they are still taking the same actions that worked in their old environment, that no longer work in their new environment. You especially see this with organizations that have been very successful in the past but their environment has changed dramatically in recent times.

This does not mean they don’t have the capacity, it only tells me that certain conversations within the management team are not happening. Although it sounds simple, as seen by many failing companies, it is not. In such situations you are often dealing with blindness, the notion of what they don’t know, they don’t know.

Also, now you also see how quickly I came up with a different interpretation, but similar to the first statement, not a story that I have checked out with anyone yet.

It is part of your leadership skills in the organization, to initiate an authentic conversation based on your concern and your commitment to mutual success. From that perspective you should then mutually explore the facts of what is really happening and all the different interpretations that are possible. From there you can then agree on new actions that will lead to different and better results.

In my next blog, I will describe how you can start this conversation.

Share
 

10 Principles to Optimize Your Business Results: Principle #6 – Conversational Dynamics

07 Jan

Ever had a conversation with someone that just wasn’t going anywhere? You’re trying to get to the heart of an issue and resolve it, and the other party is replying but not actually responding? It happens all the time — and we’re going to examine why here in Principle #6.

Conversations come in two main “flavors” — reactive and collaborative. Reactive conversations undermine communication between individuals or teams, while collaborative conversations enhance it. Reactive conversations build walls, while collaborative conversations build bridges.

Each of these main categories contains a pair of sub-categories that characterize it. Reactive conversations tend to be inauthentic and closed. “Inauthentic” means that the speakers refuse to talk about how they really feel, while “closed” means they don’t want to hear how others really feel. So it’ll come as no surprise to you that collaborative conversations tend to be the opposite — authentic and open. “Authentic” means that both parties are willing to honestly discuss their issues, and “open” means that they engage their ears to hear the other’s issues without getting defensive or upset and shutting down communications.

Obviously, collaborative conversations achieve far more than reactive ones in a business environment (and anywhere else, for that matter). But how do you go about creating them? We’re only human, and humans get defensive. We get upset. We stop listening. We insist on our point of view. How can we transcend ourselves?

For starters, you have to learn and practice the speaking and listening skills of authentic conversations to resolve issues.

Then you have to keep in mind the success principles we’ve already discussed. Keeping the big picture in mind, for instance, reminds us of our common goal — implementing the company’s strategy. That means teamwork, and teamwork only comes about when we listen to each other. Remember, conversations are the glue that holds your business systems together. Go for the strongest glue you can get!

Share
 

Using Authentic Speaking & Listening to Resolve Issues

11 Jul

Combining the Authentic Speaking Map with the Authentic Listening Map provides a powerful issue resolution process.

Share
 

Authentic Listening – Focus

16 Jun

Authentic conversations deal with interpersonal relationship and trust issues. They focus on restoring relationship and trust when breakdowns occur, to ensure ongoing alignment and commitment is present in the relationship. Developing authentic listening skills is a key element in successfully resolving interpersonal concerns. Authentic listening occurs when listeners respond to the speaker in ways, which indicate that they care about what the person is saying and give the person every opportunity to complete his or her train of thought. The idea is to let the speaker know without a doubt that you are focusing your attention on the speaker’s words and feelings with the specific intent to understand the point they are trying to make. To do this, the listener has to focus on all elements of the speaking map shown below. The listener has to make mental notes about what elements of the speaking map the speaker is disclosing, and what elements the speaker is not disclosing. You will see in importance of this in future posts.

Share
 

Authentic Speaking Map™ Summary

14 Jun

 

This post summarizes the individual posts that discussed each step in the Authentic Speaking Model.  We work with moving our clients’ conversations from Inauthentic and Closed Conversations, to Open and Authentic Conversations.  Here is the full model:

While this post discusses the Authentic Speaking Map in a linear fashion, the actual flow of the conversation may not be linear.  The speaker may start anywhere, and move to different steps as a speaker deems appropriate. However, in the design of any Authentic Conversation, I believe it is important to declare the concern that is creating the need for conversation and also your commitment to an outcome.  When declaring your commitment to the outcome, make sure it is not just about getting the concern resolved, but that it is also about the relationship.  Make sure you are committed to improving or enhancing the relationship in some manner.  Remember, ultimately, the relationship is as important as resolving the concern.

Once you declare the concern and commitment, I suggest you move to the facts of the situation that are really relevant to the conversation, and then into the interpretation that you have given these facts.  When having an authentic conversation it is always a good practice to speak only for yourself.  In other words, speak only in “I” terms not in “you” terms.  When you speak in “You” terms you have a higher likelihood of being interpreted as accusatory.  Once this happens, you are likely to move quickly into a reactive conversation. 

The next step would be to express your feelings as a result of your interpretation. After the expression of feelings, move to what you want to get out of the conversation for yourself, for the other person, and in business settings, many times, for the team and also for the company.

After declaring your wants, move into the declaration of possibilities and opportunities. Nothing comes into existence that is not a possibility first.  Many times this step is difficult for people.  They have a hard time generating possibilities for themselves. When this happens, there is usually a predisposition to no possibilities because of their characterization of the situation, or the other person. Many times we have to do significant coaching during this step. Once you have an inventory of possibilities, you can look at the possibilities and determine which possibilities represent real opportunities; opportunities you should take action on, because they have a high likelihood of resolving the concern.  

The final step is to determine the actions to be taken in order to resolve the concern.  This means that you have to be willing to make requests of the other person, as well as making offers to the other person. When these requests and offers are negotiated then is essentially a result of promises that assuming the promises are fulfilled will take care of that concern.

Share
 

Authentic Speaking – Actions

11 Jun

 

The last Authentic Speaking Map™ step is the action step.  Nothing happens until action is taken to resolve the concern or issue that started the authentic conversation in the first place.  You will see, in future posts, how the authentic speaking steps combined with authentic listening can be used to resolve difficult interpersonal concerns or issues.  This can be accomplished without the typical difficulties people have without having a map and/or knowing the steps.

In this last step, everyone in the conversation has to be willing to take actions in order to implement the opportunity or opportunities selected in the previous step.   This means that each party has to be willing to make requests and/or offers which, when negotiated, will result in promises to take corrective action.  To be effective, promises have to be made within the context of mutual respect and trust. 

 

Share
 
 
Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Linkedin button Youtube button
© Strategic Momentum 2001-2011 - All rights reserved