RSS
 

Archive for the ‘HR’ Category

The Conversation: What to do when your management team does not have the capacity to meet new business demands?

22 May

In my previous blog, I noted the frequency in our practice that we deal with this question or issue. As promised, I will guide you through how you can structure an authentic conversation that can make a difference when dealing with this issue.

This is not a conversation you have with the whole team, rather with each individual team member. When preparing for such a conversation you go through the following items:

  1. Start by asking permission, by stating your concern and your commitment. The latter should always be on how you can make you and the other successful; otherwise the conversation will go nowhere. For example, one concern could be that if the executive does not take different actions, the company will cease to exist. Your commitment should be that you are willing to work together to identify those actions that will make the executive, the team and company successful. When you deliver the message this way, it is highly likely that the executive you are speaking with is willing to listen what you have to say.
  2. Then you clearly state the facts that back up your claims and interpretations. It is only a fact if you can instrument, video or audio record the action. If you cannot do any of these three, it is an interpretation. You need facts to ground your interpretations, such as your question. For example, if inventory management is important in your industry, you can measure if your inventory is larger or smaller than the industry average. As you can see, just this one fact can have different, and even opposing interpretations of why this might be good or bad.
  3. Show the executive how these facts bring you to the interpretation: “the management team currently does not have the capacity to meet new business demands.” If you cannot point to any facts to ground this interpretation, then you have to take a moment to see if you are just making up a story (we all do quite a bit of that). Most likely, once you have identified all your facts, there is a good chance that there will be other, and equally powerful, interpretations that would lead to different actions.
  4. As you go through this conversation, it is important that you highlight the mood and emotion that this creates. It is likely that one emotion in this case is fear, the fear of going out of business. The mood it creates might show up, as “we are doomed.” What this means is that although you are still there as an employee, your mind is somewhere else most likely looking for your next opportunity.

 

You should go through this, and then the other person should go through the same four steps. You should do this back and forth as most likely there will be some facts and interpretations that the other has about you, that you didn’t know. In my experience, this very conversation will open up some new interpretations that you both did not think possible ahead of this conversation. It is likely that you would both be surprised by each other’s interpretations, but it will also highlight what was missing.

These are the beginning steps of creating a very powerful and revealing conversation that will lead to creating different results. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or share any similar stories.

Share
 

What to do when your management team does not have the capacity to meet new business demands?

08 May

This is a question I deal with on a regular basis in our consulting practice. Either it is about the executive team, the marketing team, engineering team or any other team. You see this question often in organization with stronger silos. There is a lot of danger in those broad statements that need to be further clarified for the sake of the organization.

When you are in an organization where this happens, we make these broad statements about other teams often times without fully grounding these statements. Most likely, something happened in the past, and you made a story up about it, and then what happened and the story collapsed and you start living out of that story as it is the truth with a capital T. Once that happens, you most likely start defending that story, and even worse, amongst your team members you all agree on the story, and now this is the foundation for any future action in relation to that team. Do you recognize this happening?

What else has not happened? Chances are is that you, or anyone on your team, have never shared that story with anyone of the team that you are characterizing as not capable. Nobody on that team was able to explore it with you, even more, there is a good chance they are not even aware that this is what you think of them.

It still serves us though! When something goes wrong you can blame the other team for the problems, and because you never checked it out, you get to be right about it too! Let’s explore this for the management team.

This story is only an interpretation! When you are in this situation, what do you think the answers will be to the following questions?

  • Would the people on the management team agree with this interpretation?
  • Is this something that the management team has realized?
  • Does it really apply to every person in the management team?

 

In general, it is highly unlikely that every single executive on such a team does not have the capacity to meet the new business demands. What I could believe, if there are facts, that they are not appreciating the new business reality, and that they are still taking the same actions that worked in their old environment, that no longer work in their new environment. You especially see this with organizations that have been very successful in the past but their environment has changed dramatically in recent times.

This does not mean they don’t have the capacity, it only tells me that certain conversations within the management team are not happening. Although it sounds simple, as seen by many failing companies, it is not. In such situations you are often dealing with blindness, the notion of what they don’t know, they don’t know.

Also, now you also see how quickly I came up with a different interpretation, but similar to the first statement, not a story that I have checked out with anyone yet.

It is part of your leadership skills in the organization, to initiate an authentic conversation based on your concern and your commitment to mutual success. From that perspective you should then mutually explore the facts of what is really happening and all the different interpretations that are possible. From there you can then agree on new actions that will lead to different and better results.

In my next blog, I will describe how you can start this conversation.

Share
 

Need to understand the business metrics of the people business!

11 Apr

I recently came across the following question from a global HR executive who has seen that more and more lager global company are placing operations leaders into CKBhief HR roles, and place engineers into lower HR roles for developmental assignments. If this is true, he was wondering if this sends a message to the HR professionals?

Although I have not seen this development myself yet, I am not surprised, and I would applaud the practice. There is strong evidence that when leadership focuses on sincerely and purposely developing their people outperform their peers who do not, not as much or not as consistent. At the end of the day, it is all about people doing business with people!

In my experience, HR has often allowed itself being pushed into a role where they are the caretakers of the compliance side of the business and the gatherers of the performance reviews. Often, their metrics are based on how many people attended a certain training session, not what the business impact is of these training sessions, or more importantly how their work impacts the top or bottom line. Frankly, there are plenty of HR professionals who at this current time are not comfortable with leading such a discussion.

In this global and increasingly complex environment, it will be more and more difficult treat your employees on an accounting base where you acquire, use, depreciate and scrap them. There certainly is already plenty of evidence that separates high performing organizations when the executives have the ability to lead and engage their employees as a strategic asset where you nurture, develop, grow and improve their asset value.

Recognizing this trend, is also recognizing the growing importance of HR and Organizational Development in organization to become functions that are equally driven by business drivers, just like operations, manufacturing, marketing, sales, logistics, etc.

How to better create strong HR leaders by intentionally exposing them to different disciplines as well as developing new HR processes and systems by infusing people with non-HR backgrounds! It is by creating such cross-functional ability, that these companies will thrive in this new environment! I trust that this is the beginning of a new and positive trend that will benefit the successful companies and its shareholders.

Share
 

Do you have or see meetings after the real meeting?

13 Jul

We live in language similar to how fish live in water. It is transparent to us. If we want to improve our conversations in a fashion as we discuss here on the Executive Perspective blog, you also need to understand the type of conversations that you are currently having within your team and organization.

  • Have you ever been part of an organization laced with politics?
  • Do you recognize the person who is not there to help the team agenda but is trying to push their own agenda?
  • Do you ever feel that you are not receiving the information you need to be successful at your position?
  • Do you participate in meetings where you or someone else is not saying everything, but are calling a smaller meeting after the meeting?



One common denominator in all these organizations is what we call ‘Inauthentic Conversations.’ In this conversation, you as the speaker are communicating certain things, but more importantly you are withholding other information that you should be sharing with the listener. The listener now cannot interact to that what you are not saying, has to make their own interpretation, and typically will withhold information themselves in their response.

These withheld conversations unexamined will not allow you to break through the cycle of politics, dysfunctionality or those meetings after the meeting. These withheld conversation represent an automatic and immediate break in trust. This will always impact employee performance, and hence organizational performance as illustrated in this recent study from Watson Wyatt.

What do you think the impact is of stopping the withheld conversations at your organizations?

Share
 

Are you part of a High Performing Team?

29 Jun

We often hear that high-performing teams happen by accident. “If you hire the right people, you feel it when you are on a high-performing team.” Does that sound familiar?

That is not our reality. We strongly believe that you can create high-performing teams by design but in order to do that there are three things that you need to know:

1. Where are you going?

    Does your team have a strong purpose and a clear mission of what it needs to achieve? The difference between a team and a group is that a team has a shared goal, and the team members are aligned and committed to get to that goal. However, they will not talk about the goal, or any issues they see in getting to that goal, unless there is sufficient amount of relationship and trust.

    2. How are you going to get there?

      How is your team working together, and are there clear accountabilities of who is doing what in order to achieve the goal? If there is no clear conversation about how you work together and being sincere about your accountabilities, team members will have to start guessing about what it is that you will or will not do.

      3. Where are you now?

        None of the first two distinctions will matter at all, unless you as team have a clear idea of where you are currently. Additionally, you are prepared to have an open conversation about what it is you need to do to achieve the mission. We have a simple high performing team survey that we use to get that conversation started. What is interesting about the results of that survey is that there often is a difference between how you think the team will answer and what they will actually answer.

        For a limited time, we offer our readers of our blog access to this high performing team survey that they can fill out with their team. If you are interested to take this survey with your team, contact me at kbogaert@strategic-momentum.com, and I will be happy to set you and your team up for a free survey that will take each team member 10 minutes to fill out anonymously.

        Share
         

        Is HR more than administration? Or can they play a role in Innovation?

        17 May

        In many companies HR is not considered a strategic player.  They play an administrative and compliance role, but they do not sit at the strategic table.  They are not invited to participate with the operational executives when it comes to issues dealing with the business.  They are invited to work in the business, but they are not invited to work on the business.

        Traditionally, HR’s role has been seen as an administrative function focused on recruiting, compensation, benefits and compliance. Unfortunately, that is HR’s public identity. In an increasingly complex environment, the status quo for people is no longer good enough as highlighted in the Future of HR.

        If an HR professional wants to be a strategic player within their organization they have to expand their competencies to include developing an understanding of the business, its strategic objectives and the depth and breadth of competencies necessary to fulfill the strategic objectives.  Also, the HR executive and manager has to be able to develop and guide the change process, build and develop an appropriate culture, and put in place the strategies and initiatives to develop high-performance teams at all levels of the organization.

        Is HR willing to step up to that plate? Or are they comfortable in their current role? If HR is not participating in the strategic conversation, it will help if they can define the following questions:

        • What does it mean to think strategically from an HR perspective?
        • What strategic competencies does the HR professional need to develop?
        • What should HR professionals be focused on strategically?
        • How should the strategic focus fit and support the corporate mission?



        Defining the answers to these questions will allow HR, and any other executive that wants to be involved in the strategic conversation, to build their strategic muscle and claim their place as a strategic player. More importantly, it will define their role in the innovation success of the company they work at.

        Share
         
         
        Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Linkedin button Youtube button
        © Strategic Momentum 2001-2011 - All rights reserved